A Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II – The F35 Joint Strike Fighter ‘program is the most expensive military weapons system in history’

Share this on Facebook download .zip with all pictures

EDIT: This got away from me a bit, TL;DR at the end.

First, I think this jet is a mess, good at many things but not great at anything, or even necessarily better than other jets, and costs way too much, but I digress. You’re asking someone to indulge and tell you about the jet, and I’m having trouble getting some sleep, so I’ll bite.

First, to overview the Joint Strike Fighter program in general, the role that the F-35 is meant to fill. The advantages here are more a matter of logistics and program criteria than any particular strength or weakness of any given characteristic of the craft itself.

The F-35 is the result of US Military’s desire for a next-generation Joint Strike Fighter. It comes in three main flavors, A (Air Force), B (Marines, SVTOL) and C (Navy, built for Short/Carrier Take off and Landing).It’s meant to be a multi-role, all-weather, swiss army knife jet. It’s a versatile platform that can be deployed at scale, with the three main variants sharing a wide variety of parts. The upside of this – which is all too often underplayed – is that the over 2,000 of these the US military is wanting to purchase and employ across the Marines, Air Force, and Navy, will share many many parts. And I don’t just mean nuts and bolts, but the same fuel, the same armaments, same avionics, etc. Now, there are other people in this thread saying they share up to 90% of the same parts, and this is not true unless you counting by the pound and including fuel and bombs. This shows the structural components that are or aren’t shared between the three primary variants: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/f-35-specs.htm. Stil;, this is hugely important, because it gives the US Military a platform that it can deploy at scale (the plan is currently to order and put into service over 2,000 of these), in a variety of situations, while keeping the logistics comparatively simple. And logistics is more important than the capability of any given fighting machine in a military. Additionally, training is vastly simplified and streamlined by using this common platform, not just for the pilots, but for the people who maintain, launch, store, build, repair, move, and otherwise deal with the craft.

Sure, there are specialized craft that can perform specific roles better than the F-35, but the point is that the F-35 is good enough in most cases across a wide variety of deployments, and what one particular F-35 plane lacks in comparison to a competitor, it makes up for in shear force of scale and vastly simplified logistics. It’s not a niche plane that runs on a niche fuel or uses niche weapons. All of that will be built at scale, with supply routes already established for simple maintenance purpose, so if shit does hit the fan, you don’t run out of ammo/fuel/planes, or have plenty but have them on the wrong side of the world.

With regard to the actual merits of the planes design and characteristics itself: The plane is of comparable size to the F-16 it replaces and expands upon, featuring similar wing span, length and height. However, it’s far heavier (half again as heavy as the F-16 when both are empty), but has nearly double the max take off weight. Simply put, it can carry a lot more “stuff” by weight, be it bombs, missiles, fuel, etc with the A and C variants capable of at least 30% greater payload than the F-16. Speaking of stealth, it has substantially reduced radar signature and substantially superior avionics in comparison with the F-16. In fact, the F-35 has a smaller radar signature than even the F-22.

It’s combat range is superior to the F-16 – which is a bit difficult to specify without making this even longer than necessary, but it basically boils down to “given how the military plans to equip this craft, it is able to travel farther and return without refueling than the previous craft.” Granted, the F-16 could be strapped with some large fuel tanks to give it considerable range, but that’s not light, and results in significantly reduced armament payload. The F-35 can also be strapped with fuel tanks, and is capable of carrying an overall larger load, so while I’d take the stated numbers of nearly twice the range of the F-16 with a grain of salt, I do think it’s reasonable to say the F-35 does indeed possess a significantly larger combat range.

They’re specific armaments is honeslty not worth discussing. Yes, they’re different. Yes, the F-35’s are generally better suited to the task(s) it’s meant for. That’s not necessarily a design flaw of the F-16 though so much as it is that the F-16 program as a whole operated with a certain capacity in mind, and had a specific set of weapons to compliment it. Likewise the F-35 has specific goals, and has specific weapons to compliment it, and benefits from being newer and a new platform, thus it’s easier to justify using newer/more modern weaponry (you have to pay to design and build the delivery system and electronics anyway, so the primary cause for retiscence in not updating the F-16 – cost of conversion – is nullified by virtue of it being unavoidable). Generally speaking there’s nothing on/in the F-35 missile/bomb wise that the F-16 couldn’t carry technically speaking, albeit with some conversion. But that brings me to my final point.

The F-35 is an electronics powerhouse. The air combat platform of the future is not about dog fighting, it’s about sensor-sight and communication. The US military could have just “refreshed” the F-16, giving it the modern weapons compliment of the F-35, and hell, for the sake of argument lets say we replace the engines too with something more efficient to give it comparable range as the F-35. I don’t think this would have been a wise course of action, but lets roll with it for arguments sake. This F-16 2.0 would be operationally inferior to the F-35 still, even if it had the same combat range and payload capacity, because it lacks the advanced sensors, avionics, and communications arrays, as well as suffering from a comparably massive radar signature. Swapping those electronics is not as simple as changing the radar detector in your car or the cpu in your computer.

The radars themselves are incredibly complex and expensive apparatuses that are specifically built to fit within the air frame of the air craft. Like wise, that Airframe is built with that radar in mind, along with the massive compliment of other sensors and electronics (missile detection systems, MANY various communications and location systems and their backups, imaging and survaillence systems, etc etc, in addition to the actual shooty and explody and thrusty bits). Getting all of that to fit, fit well, and remain balanced so that the plane can manuever nimbly yet predictably is a monumental challenge when you have free reign to build a whole new airframe and contract each specific puzzle component to fit together properly. Trying to shoe horn all of that into thousands of already built aircraft would, frankly, make the F-35 program look like a streamlined and cheap option by comparison, while still being functionally superior. At the end of the day the F-35 can make FAR more effective use of it’s armament than a F-16 can, because the F-35 is able to see much farther, at much greater detail, both in the air and on the ground, allowing it to deliver it’s ordinance with superior precision from a superior distance, all the while being better able to communicate what information it has with the other elements in the air with it.

TL;DR:

At the end of the day, judging the F-35 program by the capabilities of a single F-35 in an isolated environment is akin to judging a Container Ship by the craftsmanship of a single shipping container. The F-35 is a few thousand pieces in the larger puzzle that is the US Military, pieces that are similar enough that most can be freely exchanged with the other and moved around the world if need be without unduly upsetting the support and supply structure that keeps them fueled, armed and flying. Basically, the F-35 incorporates a lot of the “support” elements (such as an AWACS, KC-135 or seperate reconaissance air craft) into it’s own shell, and is able to travel farther from the pack, but still remaining relatively safe and in direct contact with command due to it’s exceptional sensors, survaillence, and countermeasure systems. The F-16 may be able to out dog fight it, but it’s unlikely an F-16 (or any craft, even an F-22) is going to get anywhere close to dogfighting range before the F-35 either GTFO’s, rallies some air superiority support of it’s own, or just blows you out of the sky from a safe distance. Sure, it’s not invulnerable, but it’s highly capable, normalizing the supply requirements and reducing the overall number of craft needed to be in the air to perform the same operations.

Latest Comments
  1. fogleodelia December 22, 2016
  2. brusswszech December 20, 2016
  3. RebeckaGuyton December 18, 2016
  4. Rac December 16, 2016
  5. ShahidAqq December 13, 2016
  6. Nyest December 8, 2016
  7. ShahidAqq December 6, 2016
  8. DianHohn December 4, 2016
  9. Yonys December 2, 2016
  10. Tryt November 22, 2016
  11. tischDE November 20, 2016
  12. MilesVickers November 17, 2016
  13. Inest November 16, 2016
  14. Sadys November 15, 2016
  15. AlexTibbs November 11, 2016
  16. Yonys November 11, 2016
  17. DomingaRico November 6, 2016
  18. Korah November 5, 2016
  19. sarkisian93 October 30, 2016
  20. Laeld October 22, 2016
  21. Dotuton October 17, 2016
  22. Tanenth October 16, 2016
  23. EunaCalifano October 15, 2016
  24. ArletteMaddix October 11, 2016
  25. Mcaaast9 October 5, 2016
  26. Queton October 1, 2016
  27. Cheann October 1, 2016
  28. ArletteMaddix September 30, 2016
  29. sarkisian93 September 29, 2016
  30. Ashend September 26, 2016
  31. Yonys September 25, 2016
  32. Daros September 25, 2016
  33. Haizden September 25, 2016
  34. Yonys September 24, 2016
  35. TakakoMelnick September 22, 2016
  36. Chawler September 18, 2016
  37. RomaMcray September 15, 2016
  38. RebeckaGuyton September 13, 2016
  39. Sulghaeng September 12, 2016
  40. Nulad September 9, 2016
  41. chrisman9020 September 9, 2016
  42. NelsonBakken September 9, 2016
  43. czakNorris1 September 6, 2016
  44. Oasi August 31, 2016
  45. Queton August 30, 2016
  46. tauskny August 29, 2016
  47. Csmoak09 August 29, 2016
  48. Iceru August 27, 2016
  49. RebeckaGuyton August 25, 2016
  50. VinitaRezendes August 24, 2016
  51. Kimskel August 17, 2016
  52. Queighty August 16, 2016
  53. AlexTibbs August 12, 2016
  54. MilesVickers August 7, 2016
  55. MilagroConti August 6, 2016
  56. Kimskel July 30, 2016
  57. Nyest July 29, 2016
  58. Whail July 20, 2016
  59. Chaiwor July 18, 2016
  60. Imale July 17, 2016
  61. bellowsE July 14, 2016
  62. poissonman88 July 12, 2016
  63. Ongha July 11, 2016
  64. Adald July 9, 2016
  65. Belacha July 9, 2016
  66. Claribel1 July 2, 2016
  67. LucienneDewees July 1, 2016
  68. Ingn June 30, 2016
  69. garza77 June 27, 2016
  70. Ceribo June 26, 2016
  71. mcnabb June 10, 2016
  72. Eldoq June 10, 2016
  73. Tiarad June 9, 2016
  74. Phois June 3, 2016
  75. Oldtiavor June 3, 2016
  76. Ceribo June 1, 2016
  77. southwickship5 May 27, 2016
  78. Kimskel May 24, 2016
  79. Kinild May 23, 2016
  80. Nyill May 19, 2016
  81. Nah May 19, 2016
  82. Laeld May 18, 2016
  83. Ingn May 18, 2016
  84. Ongha May 17, 2016
  85. LeonardEdlund May 16, 2016
  86. ucid May 13, 2016
  87. Iceru May 7, 2016
  88. sarkisian93 May 6, 2016
  89. Endrr May 4, 2016
  90. ucid April 21, 2016
  91. Rel April 18, 2016
  92. Cerlory April 13, 2016
  93. Korah April 12, 2016
  94. Eldoq April 10, 2016
  95. Laeld April 7, 2016
  96. Tabelque April 1, 2016
  97. Iworo April 1, 2016
  98. Awust March 29, 2016
  99. Mylil March 28, 2016
  100. Imem March 21, 2016
  101. MilesVickers March 16, 2016
  102. hobbyrobie186 March 15, 2016
  103. Cerlory March 13, 2016
  104. Sayeche March 11, 2016
  105. LacyMaberry March 9, 2016
  106. Laeld March 8, 2016
  107. Usklor March 8, 2016
  108. Orpsam March 7, 2016
  109. Tonser March 7, 2016
  110. uruch March 6, 2016
  111. Oughumde March 2, 2016
  112. presley77 March 1, 2016
  113. LatashiaReece February 29, 2016
  114. Tonser February 26, 2016
  115. CarlGuerrier February 22, 2016
  116. Emn February 21, 2016
  117. MilagroConti February 21, 2016
  118. Haizden February 17, 2016
  119. Emn February 13, 2016
  120. Wartin February 11, 2016
  121. Whail February 9, 2016
  122. Iss January 27, 2016
  123. brusswszech January 26, 2016
  124. rowles09 January 17, 2016
  125. uruch January 17, 2016
  126. dorothywarkocz5 January 16, 2016
  127. Queighty January 12, 2016
  128. Korah January 9, 2016
  129. Rodel January 8, 2016
  130. Nicolhowle January 3, 2016
  131. Rosybi December 31, 2015
  132. Endvesa December 23, 2015
  133. Nah December 21, 2015
  134. Daros December 19, 2015
  135. Kinild December 17, 2015
  136. Claribel1 December 17, 2015
  137. Oughumde December 10, 2015
  138. NelsonBakken December 9, 2015
  139. Dotuton December 7, 2015
  140. Radbel December 6, 2015
  141. Iworo December 5, 2015
  142. CarlGuerrier December 4, 2015
  143. Isquaugh November 29, 2015
  144. Sordmiecz4 November 27, 2015
  145. presley77 November 18, 2015
  146. southwickship5 November 18, 2015
  147. vanderpool39 November 14, 2015
  148. Nyem November 12, 2015
  149. Rodel November 12, 2015
  150. Neab November 9, 2015
  151. Endrr October 27, 2015
  152. Nyill October 27, 2015
  153. NelsonBakken October 26, 2015
  154. Korah October 18, 2015
  155. Kimskel October 14, 2015
  156. Wartin October 9, 2015
Comments are closed.